CHAPTER TWO

Neutrality, Exile, and Refuge

The Acadians from Nova Scotia to Louisiana, 1713-1812

   

XVI. "French Neutrals"

The treaty signed at Utrecht in 1713 decreed that the French inhabitants of Nova Scotia who "are willing to remain there and to be subject to the Kingdom of Great Britain, are to enjoy the free exercise of their religion according to the usage of the Church of Rome, as far as the laws of Great Britain do allow the same."  If any of them chose to leave the colony and forgo British rule, the treaty gave them a year to do it.01  

At first, many Acadians gave serious thought to abandoning the colony and moving to Canada or some other French possession.  In the end, however, most of them stayed, for several compelling reasons.  

The first reason was the confusion created in North America by the Peace of Utrecht.  The treaty also said that "all of Nova Scotia or Acadia comprised in its ancient limits, as also the city of Port Royal" now belonged to the victorious British.  A provision of the treaty empowered commissioners from Britain and France to determine the exact boundaries between the two nations in the region around the Bay of Fundy.  The commissioners argued for months over what exactly were the "ancient limits" of Acadia.  Did the old French colony include not only peninsula Nova Scotia but also present-day Maine, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Cape Breton Island, and Newfoundland as well?  Such was the view of the British commissioners.  The French commissioners saw things differently.  They conceded to the British only Newfoundland and the peninsula of Nova Scotia; the rest of old Acadia belonged to France.  In the end, nothing was settled, and the boundaries remained a bone of contention between the two powers for the next half century.  Kept informed of this dispute by their parish priests, the inhabitants of Chepoudy, Petitcoudiac and even Chignecto insisted that they still resided in French territory.  The inhabitants of the Minas Basin were confident that, although they clearly resided in territory awarded to the British, their new masters in Annapolis Royal would be able to control them no more effectively than the French officials had done from Port-Royal.  Moreover, who could say that the British would remain in "control" of the peninsula?  They had "ruled" it before and given it back.  Why would this time be different?02  

There was also a strong psychological reason for the Acadians to remain in British Nova Scotia:  despite the lure of French Canada and the kinsmen who had gone there, they truly had no place else to go, no other place to call home.  This place, no matter who "controlled" it, remained the heart and soul of their identity as a people.  By 1713, some families had lived in the colony for nearly three-quarters of a century.  The pioneers of Beaubassin had farmed the Chignecto peninsula for over 40 years. The  inhabitants of Minas had been transforming that incomparable basin into an agricultural paradise for three decades now, time enough to see their children produce children of their own.  They had expended so much time and energy wresting their pastures and fields from the bay and its tributaries, why would they want to abandon their lands simply because of a temporary change of masters?  Queen Anne, in her final days, had given them incentive to stay.  In late 1713, Louis XIV, in a rare fit of compassion, had "emptied France's prisons of all Protestants jailed because of their religious beliefs.  Queen Anne was so moved that she felt compelled to reciprocate, and she wrote her new governor in Nova Scotia 'to continue our subjects, to retain and enjoy their said lands and tenements without molestation, as fully and freely as our other subjects do or to sell the same, if they shall rather choose to remove elsewhere.'"  A few families, perhaps some of the newer ones, abandoned the colony, but the vast majority stayed.  They would take their chances with the British, come what may, as they had done many times before.03

There was a price to pay for staying, however.  After the year of decision was up, the treaty authorized the British authorities in Annapolis Royal to impose on the remaining "French Neutrals," as the British called the Acadians and as they came to call themselves, an oath of allegiance to the new British monarch, George I, who had succeeded his cousin Anne upon her death in 1714.  In their attempts to compel the Acadians to take this oath, the British officials learned first hand how stubborn Acadians could be.  The Acadians resisted taking an unconditional oath of allegiance to the British crown as long as they could, playing a dangerous game of cat and mouse with their foreign overlords.  This game went on for over four decades and was played skillfully by these simple farmers, until history once again came crashing down on the hapless Acadians.04

At first the mouse had certain advantages over the cat.  For most of those four decades, the only British presence of any substance in Nova Scotia was the garrison that occupied the old French fort at Annapolis Royal.  ...  

Life in Acadia under British rule--the Acadians as "French Neutrals."  Evolution of the Acadian culture.  Remarkable growth of the Acadian settlements during the 30-year peace under British domination, including migration to Île St.-Jean and Île Royale.  The role of French and Canadian priests in the maintenance of Acadian culture.  Construction of the French fortress at Louisbourg on Île Royale, 1719.  Another war between Britain and France in America, King George's War, 1743-48.  Capture and return of the French fortress at Louisbourg and the British response at Halifax, 1749.  More imperial conflict in the 1750s, including the burning of Beaubassin by Father La Loutre and his Mi'kmaq Indians.  The French and Indian War begins in the Ohio country, 1754.  Braddock's overall strategy for subduing the French in North America ... including an offensive by Moncton against the Acadians.  Defeat of Braddock, spring 1755, and the assurance of another long war between the imperial powers.  Charles Lawrence becomes lieutenant governor of Acadia, 1754.  The building of Fort Lawrence on the site of Beaubassin.  The British attack on Fort Beauséjour, 1755.   The capture of "French Neutrals" in Beauséjour.  Lawrence's final solution for the Acadian question--his policy of expulsion and dispersal.  Acadian reactions to this policy.  Commencement of Le Grande Dérangement, 1755.  The French in Louisiana, 1682-1766. Overview of the Acadian exile experience, focusing on those families who settled in Louisiana and became the basis of the Cajun culture there, 1755-85.  Acadian assimilation in Louisiana in the upper and lower Bayou Teche valley, in the prairies around Opelousas, along the Acadian Coast on the Mississippi River above New Orleans, and along Bayou Lafourche, 1764-1803.  New settlement patterns.  Cultural influences—Creole French, Spanish, German, American Indian, African—on the new arrivals.  Slavery and the Acadians.  The Louisiana Purchase, statehood, and the beginning of the "Americanization" of Louisiana Acadians.  

___________________________

NOTES

01.  Quote from Parkman, France & England, 2:906.  Arsenault, History, 75, gives a detailed analysis of the treaty and its provisions.  

02.  See Arsenault, History, 75-76, 79; Griffiths, From Migrant to Acadian, 269-74; Parkman, France & England, 2:473-75, 906-07, 928-29, who, typical of devout Protestant scholars, emphasizes the role of the French priests in stirring up the Acadians against the British.  Milling, Exile Without End, 5, says "The majority of the Acadians expressed a desire to remove to Canada," but that the British authorities more or less tricked them into staying.  

03.  See Arsenault, History, 77-78, who points out that some of the younger families without land left the Annapolis and Minas basins and moved to Chepoudy and Petitcoudiac to escape British rule.  The French also tried to lure Acadians to Cape Breton Island, which the French now called Île Royale, but most of the Acadians refused to budge.  See also Parkman, France & England, 2:462-63.  The oldest families in Acadia were, in alphabetical order, Boudrot, Bourg, Comeau, Doucet, Dugas, Gaudet, Gautreaux, Girouard, Hébert, Landry, Martin, and Thériot, whose patriarchs had settled in the colony by 1640.  See Appendix.  Quote from Arceneaux, No Spark of Malice, 47.  

04.  The term "French Neutrals" dates from 1730, when the Acadians took a conditional oath administered by Governor Phillips.

*

[rough & incomplete]

For decades after the British acquired the colony in 1713 at the end of Queen Anne's War, the Acadians had insisted that they were "neutrals" in the struggle between France and Britain.  They steadfastly held on to their culture, their French language, their French customs, their Roman Catholic faith, but scrupulously avoided aiding their fellow Frenchmen in Canada when conflicts erupted between the imperial rivals.  Still, the Acadians were not above trading illegally with the French fortress at Louisbourg on Cape Breton Island, driving entire herds of cattle across the isthmus at Chignectou to the north side of the Nova Scotia peninsula.  Distrustful of these French settlers with their foreign ways and their clever trade arrangements, British officials in Annapolis Royal (formerly Port-Royal) tried mightily to compel the Acadians to take an unqualified oath of allegiance to the British crown.  The Acadians refused to take such an oath and clung stubbornly to their dubious notion of neutrality.  For the most part the British governors shrugged off the matter; only the Acadians and their fecund farmsteads could guarantee steady sustenance to the British garrisons in Nova Scotia.  The Acadians went about their business as they had always done, constructing more dykes to create new grain fields and providing the necessities of life for the British as well as for themselves.  They prospered and multiplied under generally benevolent British rule ... as long as they maintained their strict neutrality.  

This handy arrangement began to unravel when war broke out again in Europe in the early 1740s after nearly three decades of relative peace between the old antagonists.  With the coming of war the British were alarmed to learn that not-so-very-neutral Acadians had crossed into nearby French territory and aided their fellow Frenchmen in the fight against the British.  ...

The War of the Austrian Succession, as it was called, despite the amazing victory of a ragtag New England militia that captured the French fortress at Louisbourg, proved as indecisive as the earlier wars between the European imperial powers.  It ended with a treaty signed at Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748.  By this treaty, Nova Scotia remained in British hands ... but Cape Breton Island--and Louisbourg--were returned to the French, who promptly poured more millions into making it even stronger than before!   The British retaliated the next year by building Halifax on the Atlantic side of the Nova Scotia peninsula and moving the colonial headquarters there from Annapolis Royal.  With peace, the Acadians resumed their dubious neutrality, trading with Louisbourg as well as with Halifax and the other British posts, a dangerous game for the independent-minded Acadians, but one that they were certain they could master indefinitely.  Louisbourg was isolated, and the French there paid good prices for cattle driven from Beaubassin to the fortress.  British settlers were still few in Nova Scotia, so the British garrisons still depended on the Acadians for their sustenance.  Though Halifax lay on the opposite side of the peninsula from the main Acadian settlements along the Bay of Fundy, the Acadians blazed a trail between their settlements and the new capital down which they drove their cattle and grain-laden wagons.  The trade with Louisbourg worried the British terribly, however, and British governors pressured the Acadians to take the unqualified oath.  The Acadians politely but firmly refused, and there the matter lay ... until war erupted again and threatened the delicate balance between Acadian neutrality and British tolerance.  

As every student of American history knows, this final war between the British and the French erupted in the Ohio country, where the French established posts to hem in the British colonies along the Atlantic seaboard.  Robert Dinwiddie, the royal governor of Virginia, which claimed the Ohio region, sent young militia officer named George Washington to the Ohio in the spring of 1754 to drive the French away.  In the opening round of the new war, Washington ambushed a small French force, killed the French commander, and built Fort Necessity nearby as a base for further operations against the French.  Before Washington could attack French Fort Duquesne, however, the French surrounded Necessity, captured Washington's entire force and sent the young colonel and his militiamen marching back to Virginia.  The British retaliated the following year by sending a column of regulars under General Edward Braddock to obliterate the French presence in the Ohio country.  Again, using their Indian allies to good effect, the French ambushed the British column, mortally wounded Braddock, and compelled Washington and the British survivors to fall back to Virginia.  What had started as a dispute over territory claimed by both nations gave every promise of erupting into a war of annihilation.  

This latest conflict between the two powerful imperial rivals made worse the decades-long antagonism between the British officials who controlled Nova Scotia and the French Acadians, who still made up the majority of settlers in the colony.  In September 1754, Charles Lawrence, a British officer who neither trusted nor respected the Acadians, became lieutenant-governor of Nova Scotia.  With war, the authorities in London expected him to control the large French population and make certain that they did not aid their fellow Frenchmen in a contest that was spinning out of control.  Lawrence was ready to use the harshest methods to subdue the troublesome Frenchmen, even banishing them from the colony and replacing them with British settlers if his superiors would approve such a radical scheme.  ...

[top of page Chapter Two]

Copyright (c) 2001-10  Steven A. Cormier